Sign Up for Our E-Newsletter   

Daily Links for May 19
5/19/2013
Dick Durbin’s double standard on IRS targeting conservative organizations
5/19/2013
Cleveland teachers’ contract: It’s better than the one we got
5/19/2013
Daily Links for May 18
5/18/2013
Capitol Updates: May 13 week in review
5/18/2013
Buyer’s remorse: ObamaCare tax will slam union workers
5/18/2013
Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis wins second term
5/17/2013
PRESS RELEASE: "Cost shift" more affordable for schools if Illinois adopts a 401(k)-style retirement system for government workers
5/17/2013
Pension cost shift: why school districts would benefit from a 401(k)-style retirement plan
5/17/2013
City of Chicago plan revealed for public funding of private, DePaul University stadium
5/17/2013
Our reaction to Gov. Walker's victory in Wisconsin
Share |

6/5/2012
by Paul Kersey

As Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker emerges victorious from a union-backed recall campaign, it is time to step back and look at the larger picture. It is one in which unions, especially those that supposedly represent government employees, are coming under increased scrutiny and their powers are being pared back throughout the five Great Lakes states.

Gov. Walker attracted the anger of those unions when he sharply limited their bargaining authority and gave individual employees the right to decide for themselves whether or not to join or support a union. But he is hardly alone:
  • In Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and the Legislature have passed a raft of reforms, most of them modest by themselves but fairly substantial when taken together. Emergency financial managers have the power to set aside union contracts in cities, counties, and school distracts that are approaching bankruptcy. Teacher evaluations are no longer subject to bargaining, and government unions will be required to file annual financial reports.
  • Here in Illinois, Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn is pressing for a "management" bill that will exempt nearly 2,000 high-ranking state employees from the statutory bargaining process.
  • Indiana has generally done less bargaining with government employees than its neighbors. Last March the state passed a right-to-work law, ensuring that all employees, public or private, can withhold dues from a union that they do not support, a move that takes the Hoosier state even further from government unionism.
  • In Ohio a reform bill that was similar to Wisconsin's was passed through that state's legislature and signed into law. The reform package was rejected in a referendum, but that was last November.  With recent developments one suspects that the debate will resume there soon.
Collective bargaining for government employees is a process that has gone haywire, and the cost, measured in unaffordable benefits and taxes, is getting harder and harder to hide. Across five states, among both Republicans and even some Democrats, there is a consensus emerging: Collective bargaining is not indispensable, and in at least some cases it is an obstacle to good government. The real argument now is about how bad a problem it is and how far we should go to correct it.

Paul Kersey is the Illinois Policy Institute's Director of Labor Policy.

image credit: Gash, Morry. "Scott Walker." Wisconsin Recall. AP Images. 6 June 2012. [http://apimages.ap.org/]



Post a Comment


Type in the characters that you see in the above picture
*Name:
*Email:
*Comments:
*required
Illinois Policy Institute Privacy Policy | © Copyright 2013, Illinois Policy Institute