Sign Up for Our E-Newsletter   

Medicaid expansion won’t reduce unnecessary ER visits
5/21/2013
Michigan’s charter success story
5/21/2013
Daily Links May 21
5/21/2013
Daily Links for May 20
5/20/2013
New Oak Lawn mayor to implement Institute’s online transparency checklist
5/20/2013
Illinois one of only 7 states with unemployment higher than one year ago
5/20/2013
Daily Links for May 19
5/19/2013
Dick Durbin’s double standard on IRS targeting conservative organizations
5/19/2013
Cleveland teachers’ contract: It’s better than the one we got
5/19/2013
Daily Links for May 18
5/18/2013
The less than one percent
Share |

10/26/2012

Scott Reeder
Journalist in Residence





Would you invest your money with someone who predicted an 8.5 percent return but instead gave you a measly 0.76 percent?

Guess what? You have.

Or at least that’s how the state is investing some of your tax dollars.

The Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS), Illinois’ largest pension fund, announced its investment returns Thursday for the fiscal year that ended July 1.

Excuses were rampant. But make no mistake, the performance was pathetic.

For same period, Standard & Poor’s 500 index grew 7.39 percent and the Dow Jones industrial average grew 7.92 percent.

TRS spokesman Dave Urbanek contends those aren’t fair comparisons because the fund invests in things like real estate and bonds, as well as stocks.

True, but when my checking account collects a higher interest rate than an actively managed multibillion-dollar fund, there is reason to gripe.

Money in TRS comes from three places: educators’ paychecks, taxpayers and investments.

When investment returns come in under projections, it falls upon taxpayers to make up the difference.

It’s worth noting that members of the state’s two dominant teachers unions control a majority of the seats on the TRS board. Active and retired educators elected six Illinois Education Association members to the board, and Gov. Pat Quinn appointed one member from the Illinois Federation of Teachers.

And that board is responsible for overseeing TRS’ investments.

So why are the taxpayers – rather than the union members themselves – responsible for making up for investment shortfalls?

Perhaps that’s a question members of the general assembly need to ask.

Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time TRS investment returns have been disappointing. Before this year, the five-year average rate of return was only 4.1 percent, and the 10-year average was 6 percent.


Post a Comment


Type in the characters that you see in the above picture
*Name:
*Email:
*Comments:
*required
Illinois Policy Institute Privacy Policy | © Copyright 2013, Illinois Policy Institute