Shrinking the Illinois Senate

Brian Costin

Open government and government transparency expert

Brian Costin
October 8, 2013

Shrinking the Illinois Senate

With 42,336 elected officials as of 1992, Illinois has nearly 12,000 more state and local elected politicians than any other state. Amazingly, with this unprecedented wealth of legislators Illinois hasn’t been able to adequately address some of its most dire problems. Illinois still ranks near the bottom of the nation in numerous key economic indicators,...

With 42,336 elected officials as of 1992, Illinois has nearly 12,000 more state and local elected politicians than any other state.

Amazingly, with this unprecedented wealth of legislators Illinois hasn’t been able to adequately address some of its most dire problems. Illinois still ranks near the bottom of the nation in numerous key economic indicators, including unemployment rate, business climate, out migration and credit ratings.

The trend of lots of legislators starts from the top. With 59 members, Illinois has the third-largest state Senate body in the country. Only Minnesota, with 67 senators, and New York, with 62 senators, have more.

With this large workforce of politicians comes increased costs for state and local taxpayers in Illinois. In fact, Illinois legislators are among the highest paid in the country.

However, a constitutional amendment proposal for the November 2014 election looks to reduce the size of the Illinois Senate and bring it closer in line with the national average of 39.

This is part of the same proposal to enact eight-year term limits on members of the Illinois General Assembly.

The proposed structural changes to the General Assembly would reduce the number of state senators to 41 from 59 members, and increase the number of state representatives to 123 from 118 members. The net reduction in state legislators would be 13.

Even with the proposed reduction to 41 members, 33 states would still have smaller legislatures than Illinois. This includes California, Florida and Texas, three of the largest states in the nation.

While opponents are chastising the plan to reduce the number of state senators, the reduction will actually bring Illinois closer in line with the rest of the country. Also, it may kick start efforts to reduce the number of elected officials locally.

Here’s a look at how the Illinois Senate compares to other states.

State             Senate size
1.  Alaska 20
2.  Nevada 21
3.  Delaware 21
4.  New Hampshire 24
5.  Hawaii 25
6.  Utah 29
7.  Arizona 30
8.  Oregon 30
9.  Vermont 30
10. Wyoming 30
11. Texas 31
12. Ohio 33
13. Tennessee 33
14. Wisconsin 33
15. Missouri 34
16. West Virginia 34
17. Colorado 35
18. Alabama 35
19. Arkansas 35
20. Idaho 35
21. Maine 35
22. South Dakota 35
23. Connecticut 36
24. Michigan 38
25. Kentucky 38
26. Rhode Island 38
27. Louisiana 39
28. California 40
29. Florida 40
30. New Jersey 40
31. Virginia 40
32. Massachusetts 40
33. Kansas 40
34. Illinois (proposed)           41
34. New Mexico 42
35. South Carolina 46
36. Maryland 47
37. North Dakota 47
38. Oklahoma 48
39. Washington 49
40. Pennsylvania 50
41. North Carolina 50
42. Indiana 50
43. Iowa 50
44. Montana 50
45. Mississippi 52
46. Georgia 56
47. Illinois (current) 59
48. New York 62
49. Minnesota 67
Average senate size 39.2

 

Want more? Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox.

Thank you, we'll keep you informed!