Proposed law could save terminally ill patients in Illinois
Proposed law could save terminally ill patients in Illinois
Right-to-Try laws empower patients whose lives are on the line.
Right-to-Try laws empower patients whose lives are on the line.
The fact that the government does not like the consequences of its actions is not a reason to ignore the clear meaning of the text of the Affordable Care Act.
Health-care savings come from proposed cuts to state-employee health insurance, reinstating Medicaid reforms and ending duplicative services.
The health-benefits package provided to state workers contains much richer benefits than the average Illinoisan might receive, while paying a smaller amount for these benefits.
Illinois’ Medicaid program should be transformed into a sliding-scale premium-assistance program that targets resources to those who need them most.
State workers’ health-insurance benefits make up $3 billion of the state’s budget.
Services for the most vulnerable Medicaid populations will be first in line for budget cuts. Childless, able-bodied adults will be last.
The president’s signature health-insurance overhaul is as unpopular as ever. And the underlying causes for dissatisfaction continue to worsen.
The Affordable Care Act is headed back to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2015.
Illinois’ Medicaid reimbursement rates are dropping back to about 54 percent of what the federal Medicare program pays for similar visits and procedures.
There should be little doubt that these access problems will be exacerbated as the state has essentially handed out 500,000 Medicaid cards without providing any additional capacity for patient care.
There is clearly no lack of commitment aimed at supporting those in need here in Illinois. The question is how to do a better job of it.
Health-care access and affordability are important goals. But they will never be achieved with a single-payer system – and that isn’t bad news.
If lawmakers begin to enter the ObamaCare exchanges themselves, it will certainly draw attention to the hypocrisy of some lawmakers who have imposed this costly law on Americans. But perhaps more importantly, it could serve as an important lever to force lawmakers to re-examine the most damaging aspects of the law.